Australian Sanctions Compliance: Managing Financial Crime and Geopolitical Risk

Understanding the Australian Sanctions Regime

Australia’s sanctions regime is designed to give effect to United Nations Security Council sanctions and Australia’s own autonomous sanctions, targeting countries, entities and individuals associated with terrorism, weapons proliferation, human rights abuses and other threats to international peace and security.

Sanctions are administered primarily by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) under the Charter of the United Nations Act 1945 and the Autonomous Sanctions Act 2011. Financial institutions must ensure they do not:

  • Provide assets or economic resources to designated persons or entities.

  • Deal with funds or assets owned or controlled by sanctioned parties.

  • Facilitate transactions, services or structures that circumvent sanctions restrictions.

For banks, insurers, super funds, wealth platforms, brokers, payment providers and fintechs, sanctions compliance sits alongside AML/CTF obligations and wider financial crime frameworks.


Why Sanctions Compliance Matters

Sanctions breaches can result in criminal and civil penalties, regulatory enforcement, reputational damage and loss of correspondent banking relationships. Global counterparties expect Australian institutions to demonstrate sanctions controls that are comparable with leading international standards, including those of the US, UK and EU.

Effective sanctions compliance:

  • Protects institutions from being used to move funds linked to terrorism, proliferation, corruption or human rights abuses.

  • Supports financial stability and preserves access to global payment networks and markets.

  • Demonstrates to boards, regulators and international partners that the organisation takes financial crime risk seriously.


Key Challenges Facing Firms

  • Keeping up to date with frequent list changes across DFAT, UN and foreign sanctions regimes.

  • Designing screening and transaction-monitoring rules that are risk-based and reduce false positives without missing real matches.

  • Managing cross-border and correspondent banking relationships where foreign sanctions may go beyond Australian requirements.

  • Coordinating sanctions controls across payments, trade finance, securities, insurance and wealth businesses.

  • Ensuring data quality (names, identifiers, addresses, ownership information) is sufficient for reliable screening.

  • Governing alerts, investigations and decision-making, with defensible documentation and escalation to senior management where needed.


How OCG Can Help

Oceanic Consulting Group (OCG) helps financial services organisations design and embed practical, defensible sanctions frameworks that integrate with AML/CTF and wider risk programmes.

Our services include:

  • Sanctions risk assessments that map products, geographies, counterparties and delivery channels.

  • Policy, standards and procedures covering customer and payment screening, list management and escalation.

  • Screening optimisation - tuning scenarios, thresholds and workflows to balance effectiveness and efficiency.

  • Targeted financial sanctions (TFS) controls integrated with AML, fraud and transaction-monitoring systems.

  • Case-management and investigation frameworks, including documentation standards and MI for boards and risk committees.

  • Independent reviews and testing, including model validation, scenario walk-throughs and end-to-end alert lifecycle reviews.

  • Training and simulations for front line, operations, risk and compliance teams on real-world sanctions risk scenarios.


FAQs

What is the difference between sanctions and AML/CTF obligations?
Sanctions prohibit dealing with certain people, entities, sectors or activities, while AML/CTF focuses on detecting and reporting suspicious activity. Both aim to prevent misuse of the financial system and should be integrated in a single financial crime framework.

Do Australian firms need to comply with foreign sanctions (e.g., US or EU)?
Australian law requires compliance with Australian sanctions, but many institutions choose to align with key foreign regimes where they have cross-border exposures, foreign shareholders or correspondent relationships. A clear policy is essential.

What are the key controls regulators expect to see?
Risk-based customer and payment screening, up-to-date lists, clear escalation and investigation processes, robust documentation of decisions, and MI that gives senior management oversight of sanctions risk.

Strengthen Your Sanctions Compliance Framework

Work with OCG’s Financial Crime & Sanctions Specialists

Protect your organisation from sanctions breaches and reputational damage. Contact OCG to assess sanctions risk, tune screening and investigation workflows, and embed evidence-rich controls that align with Australian and global expectations.

Speak with OCG’s Risk Advisory team today

Learn more from our thought leadership articles and updates

Previous
Previous

AML/CTF Tranche 2 & Beneficial Ownership: Preparing for Australia’s Next Wave of Reform

Next
Next

Australian Credit Licence (ACL): Licensing & Obligations